Monday, September 15, 2025

The Great Game – How Afghanistan Became the Center of Global Politics


Afghanistan has been called the “Heart of Asia” for centuries. Its location at the crossroads of South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East has made it a vital link for trade, culture, and migration. At the same time, this geography has also turned Afghanistan into a battleground for empires.

From the 19th-century rivalry between the British and Russian empires, to the Cold War era, and into the 21st century with the U.S. and NATO presence, Afghanistan has always stood at the center of global politics. This ongoing struggle for influence is often referred to as “The Great Game.”

Understanding Afghanistan’s role in the Great Game helps us to better see why this country, despite its size, has remained one of the most strategic regions in the world.


🔹 1. The Origins of the Great Game

The phrase “The Great Game” first became popular in the 19th century. It described the rivalry between the British Empire and the Russian Empire for dominance in Central and South Asia.

  • Britain ruled over India, its most valuable colony.

  • Russia was expanding southward into Central Asia.

  • The fear in London was that Russia might invade India through Afghanistan.

This concern made Afghanistan a buffer state between the two great empires. Both sides sent diplomats, spies, and armies into the region to secure their influence.


🔹 2. Afghanistan as a Buffer State

Geography made Afghanistan almost impossible to ignore:

  • The Hindu Kush mountains and the Khyber Pass connected South Asia with Central Asia.

  • Whoever controlled these routes could potentially access India, Persia (Iran), and beyond.

  • Afghanistan’s rugged terrain made it difficult to conquer, but vital as a frontier.

For the Afghans themselves, this was a time of constant pressure. Local rulers had to navigate between foreign interests while keeping their tribal confederations intact.


🔹 3. The First Anglo-Afghan War (1839–1842)

To secure India, the British invaded Afghanistan in 1839. However, the campaign ended in disaster. Afghan tribes resisted fiercely, and almost the entire British army of retreat was wiped out.

This defeat showed that Afghanistan could not easily be occupied. Instead, it would remain a zone of influence controlled indirectly rather than ruled directly.


🔹 4. The Second and Third Anglo-Afghan Wars

Britain fought two more wars in Afghanistan:

  • Second Anglo-Afghan War (1878–1880): Britain secured control of Afghan foreign policy but allowed local rulers to govern internally.

  • Third Anglo-Afghan War (1919): Afghanistan regained independence in foreign affairs after World War I, signing the Treaty of Rawalpindi.

By then, Afghanistan had fully established itself as an independent buffer state, positioned between the British and Russian empires.


🔹 5. Soviet Invasion and the Cold War (1979–1989)

Fast forward to the 20th century Afghanistan again became a central stage in global politics.

  • In 1979, the Soviet Union invaded Afghanistan to support a struggling communist government.

  • This triggered one of the fiercest chapters of the Cold War.

  • The United States, along with Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and other allies, supported the Afghan resistance, known as the Mujahideen.

For ten years, Afghanistan became the arena where two global powers the U.S. and the USSR  indirectly fought each other.

The war devastated Afghanistan, causing millions of refugees to flee, but it also drained the Soviet Union’s strength. Many historians believe the Soviet defeat in Afghanistan contributed to the collapse of the USSR itself.


🔹 6. The Post-Cold War Era and the Rise of the Taliban

After the Soviet withdrawal in 1989, Afghanistan entered a period of civil war. Competing factions struggled for control until the rise of the Taliban in the 1990s.

The Taliban, emerging from madrassas in Pakistan, established control over most of Afghanistan by 1996. Their strict rule and harboring of extremist groups drew international attention.

For the world, Afghanistan was once again at the center of concern not because of Cold War rivalry, but because of terrorism and instability.


🔹 7. Afghanistan After 9/11 – U.S. and NATO Involvement

The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks changed Afghanistan’s role in global politics once again.

  • The U.S. accused al-Qaeda, based in Afghanistan, of planning the attacks.

  • A U.S.-led coalition invaded Afghanistan to remove the Taliban and dismantle terrorist networks.

  • For the next 20 years, Afghanistan became a hub of international military presence.

Countries such as the United States, the UK, Germany, Canada, and many NATO members maintained troops in Afghanistan. The conflict turned into one of the longest wars in U.S. history.


🔹 8. Regional Players in the New Great Game

The modern “Great Game” was not just about the U.S. and NATO. Other regional powers played crucial roles:

  • Pakistan: Provided support to Afghan groups while also facing cross-border militancy.

  • Iran: Balanced between opposing the Taliban and countering U.S. influence.

  • China: Invested in resources and sought stability for its Belt and Road Initiative.

  • Russia: Continued to influence Afghan politics while opposing Western dominance.

Afghanistan remained a chessboard where multiple powers moved their pieces.


🔹 9. The U.S. Withdrawal (2021) and Return of the Taliban

In August 2021, the U.S. and NATO forces withdrew from Afghanistan. The Afghan government collapsed quickly, and the Taliban regained power.

This event shocked the world and raised new questions about Afghanistan’s future. Would the country again become isolated? Would it serve as a bridge for regional trade? Or would it fall back into cycles of conflict?


🔹 10. Why Afghanistan Still Matters Today

Even after centuries of rivalry, Afghanistan remains strategically vital:

  • Geography: At the crossroads of South Asia, Central Asia, and the Middle East.

  • Resources: Afghanistan has vast reserves of copper, lithium, and rare minerals, which global powers eye for future industries.

  • Connectivity: Potential transit routes for energy pipelines and trade corridors.

  • Security: Instability in Afghanistan affects neighbors and the wider region.

The “Great Game” may have changed its players, but the importance of Afghanistan has not diminished.


🔹 11. Lessons from the Great Game

History shows several lessons:

  • Foreign invasions in Afghanistan often fail because of local resistance.

  • Stability can only come through local governance and regional cooperation, not external control.

  • The lives of ordinary Afghans must be central to any policy, as they have borne the heaviest burden of these struggles.


🔹 Conclusion

Afghanistan’s story as part of the Great Game is not simply one of rivalry between empires or superpowers. It is also the story of resilience, culture, and survival.

For centuries, this landlocked nation has been at the center of global politics from British and Russian spies, to Cold War soldiers, and now modern regional competition.

As the 21st century unfolds, Afghanistan’s role as the “Heart of Asia” continues. The challenge is whether the world will treat it as a battleground for influence or as a bridge for cooperation.

The Durand Line – A Historical Dispute That Continues to Shape South Asia


Borders are more than lines on a map; they carry the weight of history, culture, and unresolved politics. One such example is the Durand Line, a 2,640-kilometer frontier that separates Pakistan and Afghanistan. Born out of a colonial agreement in 1893, it continues to influence bilateral relations, regional politics, and the lives of millions of Pashtun tribes who live on both sides.

The Durand Line is often at the center of debates regarding sovereignty, identity, and security. While much has changed since the British Empire first imposed it, the dispute remains alive more than a century later. This article explores the history, impact, and future of the Durand Line in a neutral and educational manner, offering readers insights into one of South Asia’s most contested borders.




🔹 1. Historical Origins of the Durand Line

  • In 1893, Sir Mortimer Durand, a British diplomat, signed an agreement with Amir Abdur Rahman Khan, the ruler of Afghanistan.

  • The agreement aimed to demarcate spheres of influence between British India and Afghanistan.

  • Afghanistan retained sovereignty within its recognized borders, while Britain established control over tribal regions that eventually became part of modern-day Pakistan.

  • The agreement was meant as a diplomatic tool to avoid future territorial disputes.

Although intended to provide clarity, the agreement sowed seeds of division. Tribes that had lived under Afghan influence suddenly found themselves split across two administrations.


🔹 2. Geographic and Tribal Dimensions

The Durand Line runs across some of the most rugged terrain in the world. From the Wakhan Corridor in the northeast to Balochistan in the southwest, it cuts across:

  • Mountain ranges, deserts, and valleys.

  • Tribal lands inhabited by Pashtun, Baloch, and other ethnic groups.

  • Over 200 tribes, many of which historically ignored political borders.

For centuries, cross-border movement was normal for trade, marriage, and seasonal migration. The British sought to control these tribes, but their independent lifestyle resisted any strict border enforcement.


🔹 3. The Line After Independence (1947)

When Pakistan was created in 1947, it inherited the Durand Line as its international border. Afghanistan, however, did not accept it as permanent.

  • Afghanistan was the only country to vote against Pakistan’s admission to the United Nations, citing border concerns.

  • Afghan leaders argued that the 1893 agreement was forced and expired after 100 years.

  • Pakistan maintained that the Durand Line was legally binding and internationally recognized.

Despite this disagreement, the line functioned as the de facto boundary, with checkpoints, military posts, and trade routes operating under Pakistani administration.


🔹 4. Refugees, Wars, and the Border

The Soviet invasion of Afghanistan (1979) and the decades of conflict that followed dramatically increased the importance of the Durand Line.

  • Millions of Afghan refugees crossed into Pakistan, especially in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Balochistan.

  • Refugee camps became semi-permanent, shaping local demographics.

  • During the Afghan civil war and later the U.S. invasion in 2001, cross-border movement continued, creating both humanitarian challenges and security concerns.

This constant movement blurred the border even further, reinforcing the Afghan claim that the Durand Line is not a strict division, while Pakistan emphasized its role as a security frontier.


🔹 5. Modern Tensions Along the Durand Line

In recent years, the Durand Line has become a flashpoint in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations:

  • Border Skirmishes: Periodic clashes between security forces.

  • Trade Disruptions: Closures of border crossings such as Torkham and Chaman, affecting local economies.

  • Migration Issues: Refugee returns and restrictions.

  • Security Concerns: Both countries accuse each other of harboring militants who cross the border.

Despite attempts to fence the border, local tribes often resist, arguing that the line divides families and communities.


🔹 6. The International Perspective

  • Most of the international community recognizes the Durand Line as Pakistan’s legitimate border.

  • Afghanistan, however, has maintained a historical stance of non-recognition, though practical realities often force cooperation.

  • The issue rarely gains global headlines but remains crucial for regional stability.


🔹 7. Human Impact of the Border

Beyond politics, the real impact of the Durand Line is felt by the people:

  • Families split between Pakistan and Afghanistan.

  • Traders facing barriers for centuries-old routes.

  • Refugees caught in cycles of displacement.

For many locals, the line is not a geopolitical subject but a daily reality that shapes livelihoods, education, and even family ties.


🔹 8. The Way Forward

Experts suggest several paths:

  • Diplomatic Dialogue: Only sustained talks can reduce tensions.

  • Economic Cooperation: Shared trade and infrastructure projects may transform the border from a barrier into a bridge.

  • Cultural Recognition: Respecting the tribal and ethnic links across the line.

  • Regional Stability: Both nations benefit more from peace than prolonged disputes.

The Durand Line should not only symbolize division but also serve as an opportunity for cooperation.


🔹 Conclusion

The Durand Line is one of the most significant yet controversial borders in the world. Born out of colonial politics, it continues to shape the destiny of Pakistan and Afghanistan. While disputes remain unresolved, the future lies in peaceful dialogue, not in conflict.

For readers, understanding the Durand Line offers a window into the complex realities of South Asia — where history, geography, and identity continue to intersect.